If the law has requirements for one type of contract, they are usually that the agreement is registered in writing and signed by one or both parties or their agent. The law does not recognize any contract – or agreement – to enter into a contract in the future. It has no binding effect, because supply and acceptance do not exist. In other words, what are the terms of the offer? When deciding whether words spoken or written submissions constitute a legally binding contract, there must be at least two communications: offer and acceptance. In all of these cases, remedies are available to take corrective action as legislated. Broad statements of intent, feelings or political opinions that have no clear meaning and to which the courts can react safely cannot have any legal value. (The formation of a contract – and not just an agreement – in the strict sense requires the existence of the three other elements mentioned above: (1) Reflection, (2) with the intention of creating a legally binding contract and (3) contractual capacity) The Data Protection Directive is the first agreement that users see and are often the most visible. This is useful when you consider that data protection policies are necessary in most jurisdictions. The courts say that the parts of a contract are the best judges of the commercial fairness of a proposed contract. Companies are also the best judge in deciding whether the terms of an agreement are appropriate – before hiring it.